Review checklist
manuscript no: __________

Thorough review is the foundation of any referred journal. The purpose of the review is to provide constructive evaluation that helps both to screen out papers and to improve potentially publishable papers. Please keep in mind that Nordic Notes has a diverse readership around the world. Manuscripts should be judged primarily on technical soundness, overall contribution to Scandinavian knowledge, and clarity of communication across disciplinary boundaries. Grammar and stylistic issues will be addressed by a copy editor.

Checklist for manuscript evaluation	Yes	No	Not   evaluated
Does the manuscript present a significant original contribution to Scandinavian knowledge?
Does the manuscript address an important practical Scandinavian problem?
Is the paper appropriate for the readership of Nordic Notes?
Is the paper technically sound?
Is the manuscript well organised?
Is the manuscript well written?
Is the title appropriate for the contents?
Is the abstract concise and informative?
Are the tables and figures necessary and adequate
Is sufficient credit given to prior work?
Are interpretations and conclusions justified?
Recommendation
Publish as is Publish after minor revisions Publish only after major revisions and review Reject
Rationale for recommendation
(use additional page if necessary)

Please enclose detailed comments on a separate sheet to be forward to the author(s).
Thank you for your review.

Reviewer: _____________________________    Date: __________________